--> /* end of banner manager 1 */

Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S)

Community Action for Seaton's Regeneration Area, 80% owned by Tesco - a floodplain on a World Heritage site bordered by nature reserves, tidal river, the sea and the unspoilt town. SU4S is a state of mind - no members, no structure, no politics. SU4S has objected to 2 planning applications by Tesco, including one for a massive superstore/dot com distribution centre which led to the recent closure on the site of 400 tourist beds with the loss of 150 jobs,a gym and pool - all used by locals.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

What does Stand Up For Seaton stand for?

For those of you who want to know what Stand Up For Seaton stands for:

1. Regeneration not degeneration; a return to the original development brief

2. Community facilities for the whole town within the regeneration area

3. Seaton residents to derive the majority of the direct benefits from Section 106 payments

4. Real public consultation on all stages of the regeneration process

5. A “megamarsh” funded by external sources and not from Section 106 income from the regeneration area

6. The maximum possible amount of affordable housing in the regeneration area

7. The continuation of long-stay tourism on the regeneration site

8. An iconic Visitors Centre

9. A sustainable solution to flood water management in and around the regeneration area

10. A cutting-edge environmental approach to regeneration

2 Comments:

At 4:29 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well summed up, Sandra. An excellent statement of Seaton's needs. None of it sounds unreasonable to me!
We want Seaton to be a great place to live, as well as to visit. To be a sustainable community.

 
At 2:46 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Am I being paranoid here, or are we increasingly being portrayed as the baddies?

The 1st meeting at Winstons, called with very little notice or advertising, and attended by over 300 people, was on the 26th September.
That was when Stand Up 4 Seaton officially started. The strong feeling of Seatonians, and others attending, was all about the loss of facilities to the town, which, once gone, would be unlikely to be replaced

The megamarsh project was presented to the town, along with other projects, on 1st November.

The link with between Section 106 money and the megamarsh was only officially revealed to us with the release of the agenda on the 9th or 10th November for EDDC's meeting at the Knowle on the 15th November.

EDDC is deliberately muddying the water by trying to portray us as being against the megamarsh.

We were worried about Liatris' proposed plan long before the megamarsh was brought into the equation!

WE ARE FOR SEATON, NOT AGAINST THE MEGAMARSH!!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home